Got this when i was on a4e

Pamfil markpoulsen@nearex.com via hotmail.com	9/4/10

Welcome.

We have found your resume on the www.jobsite.co.uk site and paragoned your information with the specifications we take into consideration when looking for our staff. We are pleased to declare that you are in line with the position we are offering right now.

The Nearex Company has opened a well paid position with flexible working hours.

Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain

If you are searching for a part-time job, please write us to: markpoulsen@nearex.com
Short CV attached is recommended.

All the best,

Mark Poulsen

I got this email out of the blue, took it to my adviser and she suggested i apply for it, But being an Admin I had never heard of anyone using the word paragoned, said it was dodgy, she said oh just apply for it, but doing a little research i find it was a russian site, and it was money laundering

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=2705901  this is the forum about that email i got i showed her but she wasnt interested

The begathon

its started, some of the better performing are making a loss.. well they bid for the contract, they failed to get the basic minimum as stated in contract yet they want more money.

Ok last time i was at a4e, i was asked by the staff member to teach computers to people who were computer illiterate, they said i could teach them and they would fund a PTTLS course so i could teach , Of course when it came time they said no funding..  I was a client there, they were clients, I taught them because their computer teacher couldnt be bothered.  I got them net ready,not a4e yet i got bugger all.

Just shows they want something for nothing, no chance of a job, no chance of qual. even though i showed them adverts for 4 jobs teach but all NEEDEDa PTTLS qualification, so a4e did me out of the chance of a job because they were tighter than a ducks backside

the figures are in

It is official the Work Programme failed.. the figures they use are based on 14 months rather than a year.  and that figure is 3.3%  the contract signed by the dwp and providers said MINIMUM of 5.5%  So they FAILED.  But its even worse.. taking the year figure 12 months, they didnt even reach half of their projected successes.



254k Disabled people who were placed on the Work Programme 6,200 of them had a positive job by July 2012 a job success rate of less than 2%


http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/it-is-official-work-programme-has-failed.html


We the people on the scheme Predicted it would fail just like the last ones


Compelling those on long term unemployment to take up mandatory work for either minimal pay of £2.50 an hour, or in some cases no pay for a set period of time from 8 weeks to 26 weeks never carried a guarantee of work at the end. For the 878,000 people who participated in the Work Programme in the year from July 2011 to July 2012 less than 31,250 of Work Programme placements had resulted in a Job Outcome. This means that the success of the Work Programme was 3.53%.
                 

I dont beleive this idiot

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/9696904/Its-time-for-a-new-Beveridge.html#

And for those who claim without any record of contribution, we should be firmer still. For individuals aged under 25 who have not yet paid National Insurance contributions for a certain period, perhaps five years, unemployment benefit should be in the form of a repayable loan. An unemployed teenager would still receive the same amount of cash as now, for example, but they would be expected to repay the value once in work

Anonymity and me

I feel more free being able to speak on many subjects under this name or Eric Greenwood as I worry about threats to my life by the state.  By threats i mean sanctioned for speaking out, I have been bullied and threatened by my provider, So to stop that i have these names they grant me a peace of mind.  Unfortunately this means while i wish i could speak out in public i cannot i dare not take the risk

The right to freedom of speech and expression

The right to freedom of speech and expression

Concepts of freedom of speech can be found in early human rights documents.^[3] England’s Bill of Rights 1689 granted 'freedom of speech in Parliament' and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, adopted during the French Revolution in 1789, specifically affirmed freedom of speech as an inalienable right.^[4] The Declaration provides for freedom of expression in Article 11, which states that:

"The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every citizen may, accordingly, speak, write, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by law."^[5]

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."^[6]

Today freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional human rights law. The right is enshrined in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.^[7] Based on John Milton's arguments, freedom of speech is understood as a multi-faceted right that includes not only the right to express, or disseminate, information and ideas, but three further distinct aspects:

• the right to seek information and ideas;
• the right to receive information and ideas;
• the right to impart information and ideas.^[7]

International, regional and national standards also recognize that freedom of speech, as the freedom of expression, includes any medium, be it orally, in written, in print, through the Internet or through art forms. This means that the protection of freedom of speech as a right includes not only the content, but also the means of expression.^[7]

Other stuff

Been in the rant mode for a little too long, so for some fun...my dream game

If money was no object, I would pay someone to create a computer game with all the things i enjoy in others. In borderlands the procedural weapons and monsters and humans, In prototype 1 and 2, the ability to climb walls go on top of buildings all around. Just cause 1 and 2 the massive amount of land to run about in. Dragons dogma/two worlds two the harvesting of dead bodies for items/money etc. Saints row the third, all teh vehicles you can steal and customise and store. Two worlds the customisable magic, the breaking down of items into components, that could be used to upgrade weapons as in monster hunter. the Crafting of weapons and armour in skyrim, the upcoming possession power in dishonoured, the absorbtion and disguise ability in prototype


What i want in a video game.

Borderlands 1 and 2 the procedural creation of weapons and monsters.

Prototype 1 and 2, the ability to climb buildings just and fly from one to the other

Just cause 1 and 2, using grapples to pull yourself from one building to another

Dragons dogma/two worlds two the harvesting of dead bodies for items/money

Saints row the third, all the vehicles you can steal and customise and store

Two worlds the customisable magic, the breaking down of items into components,

the Crafting of weapons and armour in skyrim

the upcoming possession power in dishonoured, you can possess animals dogs, people, birds, rats

the absorbtion and disguise ability in prototype

Ragdoll Physics allowing dismemberment of monsters

Borderlands 1 and 2 Just cause 1, and 2, Skyrim, two world the large amount of land, spread over several islands

Buildings we can enter.  If i could scan the planet, have real cities to walk about in, think GTA the real world. of course there would be some exceptions use a procedural creation of buildings